Nigerian politicians have Machiavellian traits (Part 2)

Machiavelli’s influential treatise on wielding power has sparked ongoing debate due to its advocacy of ruthless methods. Exploring Machiavellian traits in politicians becomes crucial, particularly with elections approaching.

Machiavelli’s teachings encompass diverse aspects, notably emphasizing the importance of military strategy for rulers. Even during peacetime, he urged leaders to study history, geography, and the lay of the land, emphasizing that neglecting the art of war could lead to the loss of a principality.

Understanding human nature is another facet where Machiavelli advises rulers to be pragmatic. Recognizing the potential for ingratitude, fickleness, and selfishness, he suggests leaders should base decisions on realistic observations rather than idealistic expectations.

Deception is a tool Machiavelli considers essential for rulers, urging them to balance seeming merciful with being able to act otherwise when circumstances demand. The ability to manipulate perceptions allows rulers to navigate a landscape where deceit is prevalent.

Punishment and reward are explored as mechanisms to instill fear and loyalty in subjects. Machiavelli suggests rulers should aim for a balance between being loved and feared but acknowledges that fear often proves more effective in preventing harm. However, he cautions against actions that may lead to outright hatred, as this could provoke a desire for revenge.

Cruelty, according to Machiavelli, has a utilitarian role in maintaining order and securing power. While he advocates its occasional use, he warns against excessive cruelty, as it may lead to the populace rising against the ruler.

Machiavelli’s work, often criticized for promoting ruthlessness, challenges us to grapple with uncomfortable questions. Is the security of the state more crucial than the personal morality of its leaders? Can immoral actions be justified if they benefit society? The complex nature of Machiavelli’s philosophy demands reflection on the trade-offs between strong governance and moral principles.

This reflection aims to provide insight rather than pass moral judgment.

Chima Nnadi-Oforgu
Duruebube Uzii na Abosi