Restructuring Federal Powers and Empowering Regional Autonomy.
The argument for restructuring Nigeria and decentralizing key sectors such as transport, education, health, police, works, aviation, mines, and power to the states is multidimensional, encompassing historical, political, economic, and social aspects. With the Population Reference Bureau forecasting Nigeria’s rise as the world’s fourth-largest population by 2050, the current federal structure, primarily reliant on oil revenue sharing, is unsustainable. Transitioning to a model that promotes productivity and regional development is crucial, especially given the global shift towards a knowledge-based economy and the diminishing reliance on fossil fuels, to ensure Nigeria’s long-term economic sustainability.
A major challenge in Nigeria’s restructuring is the concern, particularly in the north, that such changes might lead to economic and political domination by other regions, aggravating existing tensions. The restructuring path requires a democratically legitimized, participatory approach that takes into account and addresses the interests of all regions.
Historical Context and Present Challenges:
Once known as “the giant of Africa,” Nigeria grapples with issues like poor infrastructure, governance deficiencies, endemic corruption, and ethnic and religious tensions. The current federal structure, a legacy of military rule and the 1999 Constitution, has led to an overly powerful central government and a skewed federal system, impeding true federalism and regional autonomy.
Nigeria’s journey to its current federal structure began post-independence in 1960, initially forming three, then four regions, each with considerable powers and financial autonomy. However, the military coups of 1966 marked a shift towards centralization, culminating in a more unitary state under military rule. This centralization, further entrenched over time, led to a bloated federal bureaucracy and numerous states with limited fiscal independence, thereby intensifying governance and development challenges.
Decentralization Proposals:
Constitutional Overhaul:
Restructuring Nigeria necessitates a brand new constitution, replacing the current one perceived as a fraud and unrepresentative of the people’s will. The debate revolves around choosing between maintaining a unitary state with devolved powers, a true federation like the United States or Canada, or a confederation with stronger regional units. A balanced federal structure, where the central government maintains key sovereign responsibilities while empowering regional units, is deemed most suitable for Nigeria. This would involve redefining federating units, possibly aligned with the six geopolitical zones, granting them more resource control and development autonomy.
Legislative Reorganization:
Decentralizing key items from the exclusive list, such as transport, education, health, police, works, aviation, mines, and power, to the states is key.
Local Governance:
The restructuring might entail eliminating constitutional recognition of local governments, leaving their creation and administration to regional governments.
Economic Considerations:
Economic issues in Nigeria, like the heavy dependence on oil revenue and centralized power and resource concentration, have hindered local initiative and development. Decentralization is viewed as a means to promote economic autonomy and regional-level development. States should manage their natural resources and strive to reduce reliance on federal allocations by developing internal revenue sources and fostering local industries.
Sector-Specific Implications:
– Power Sector:
Decentralizing the power sector, with states gaining more control over electricity generation and distribution, is expected to enhance efficiency and address persistent power supply issues. The experience with the National Electric Power Authority (NEPA) suggests that state ownership of power infrastructure may not be the most efficient approach. Emphasizing effective regulation and market mechanisms could better tackle efficiency and competition issues in the sector.
– Health and Education:
Decentralizing health and education could allow states to customize these services to local needs, though this requires careful planning to ensure countrywide uniformity in quality and access.
Implementation and Challenges:
Restructuring necessitates broad consensus among national leaders and careful consideration of Nigeria’s diverse regional interests and needs. Ensuring that decentralization doesn’t exacerbate regional disparities or heighten ethnic or regional tensions is a challenge.
The debate extends to local governance, particularly regarding local government autonomy under the 1999 Constitution. The current decentralized federation in Nigeria empowers local governments in grassroots development and service delivery, yet challenges exist in effectively exercising these powers.
Local Government Autonomy in Nigeria:
Outlined in the 1999 Constitution, local government autonomy in Nigeria is crucial for the federal structure, aiming to empower local governments in grassroots development and service delivery. However, effectively implementing these powers has been challenging. The current structure often results in local governments being overshadowed by state and federal levels, causing inefficiencies and unresponsiveness to local needs. Empowering local governments is vital in the restructuring process for several reasons. They are better positioned to understand and meet specific community needs. Autonomy would enable them to more effectively tailor services and development projects. Enhanced local government autonomy strengthens democracy by bringing government closer to the people and boosting citizen participation in governance. Autonomous local governments can deliver essential services more responsively and efficiently, being directly accountable to their local constituencies. Furthermore, with greater autonomy and resources, local governments can significantly contribute to tailored economic development, leveraging unique local opportunities and needs.
In conclusion, the restructuring and decentralization of Nigeria represent a pivotal step towards addressing the country’s diverse challenges. By redistributing powers from the federal government to regional and local levels, Nigeria can foster a more balanced, efficient, and responsive governance structure. This transition is not merely a political imperative but an economic necessity, especially in an era where diversification and localized governance are key to sustainable growth. Successfully implementing these changes will require inclusive dialogue, legislative reform, and a commitment to preserving national unity while celebrating regional diversity. Ultimately, this path promises a more resilient, democratic, and prosperous future for all Nigerians, ensuring that the country truly lives up to its potential as the ‘giant of Africa.
OBLONG MEDIA UNLIMITED 
Leave a comment