The debate over Nigeria’s political and governance structure is complex, touching on the nation’s diversity, large population, and centralized system. Nigeria’s immense diversity in ethnicities, religions, and languages is a potential strength but has led to conflicts, raising questions about the suitability of the current centralized government for such a diverse nation.
The proposal to divide Nigeria into three regions or countries stems from concerns that central control over key governance areas — including education, health, transportation, INEC, legislature, executive, judiciary, revenue collection, police, and major infrastructure — is not effective for Nigeria’s size and diversity. This centralization in Abuja hampers Nigeria’s potential, given the distinct cultural and ethnic backgrounds of Muslims and Christians and their historical power struggles.
Since 1999, the Nigerian government has operated a presidential system with executive, legislative, and judicial branches, facing challenges like corruption, ethnic and religious tensions, and political violence. Increasing calls for reform advocate for a more decentralized system to better manage the country’s diversity and improve governance.
Decentralizing the legislature, executive, and judiciary is argued to be necessary for governance that responds to the diverse needs of Nigeria’s regions. Such decentralization could lead to greater local autonomy, more relevant policies, improved efficiency, accountability, and reduced corruption.
The strong desire to restructure Nigeria, akin to the autonomous and competitive management of regions in the early to mid-1960s, reflects a need for more representative governance. This approach would allow regions greater control, enhancing governance and development.
The discussion on Nigeria’s future and political structure is rooted in its history, diversity, and the challenges of governing a large, diverse population under a centralized system. Calls for restructuring, decentralization, and more regionally autonomous governance highlight the search for a structure that can address Nigeria’s unique challenges.
Centralization impacts electoral choices and government accountability, often leading to governance that does not reflect the diverse interests of the populace. Decentralizing control of education and health could lead to more effective and culturally sensitive policies, addressing the varied needs of Nigeria’s population.
The case for a decentralized system in Nigeria, given its mineral and human resources, is compelling. This could result in more efficient resource distribution, reduced corruption, and more transparent and accountable local governance.
In conclusion, restructuring and decentralizing governance in Nigeria is driven by the need to manage the country’s diverse needs and resources effectively. Decentralization offers tailored resource management, reduced corruption, and more responsive policies, aligning with the goal of national prosperity and equitable development.
Chimazuru Nnadi-Oforgu
Duruebube Uzii na Abosi
OBLONG MEDIA UNLIMITED 
Leave a comment