Revisiting the 1963 Constitution: Lessons for Restructuring Nigeria.

The 1963 Constitution of Nigeria, often referred to as the Republican Constitution, marked a significant transition in Nigeria’s constitutional and political development. It replaced the Queen of England as the head of state with a President elected by a secret ballot of the joint session of the two houses of the Federal Assembly. This move to a republic signified Nigeria’s full sovereignty, with the President becoming the Head of State and Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces. The Supreme Court replaced the Privy Council as the highest court of appeal, which was a move towards judicial independence and the entrenchment of fundamental human rights. Additionally, the Prime Minister’s role was strengthened, and regional governors’ executive powers were enhanced, reflecting a shift towards greater autonomy and local governance. The Constitution also introduced provisions for emergency powers for the federal government over the legislative arm and detailed the process for the creation of states and boundary adjustments

The merits of the 1963 Constitution included the establishment of a home-based constitution, which was a significant step towards decolonization, giving Nigerians complete control over decision-making and implementation. The constitution guaranteed the rights of citizens, ended British influence in the country, and introduced judicial review powers to the Supreme Court. However, it also had several demerits, such as representing minority interests, fusing the legislative and executive arms of government, allowing carpet crossing, and exposing the legislative system to corruption

In terms of restructuring Nigeria to reflect equity, fairness, and justice for its multi-ethnic society, the 1963 Constitution provides both historical context and potential lessons. Its emphasis on a home-grown constitutional framework and the mechanisms for state creation and boundary adjustments could offer insights into addressing contemporary calls for restructuring. The constitution’s focus on regional autonomy and local governance could inform debates on fiscal federalism and devolution of powers, which are central to the restructuring discourse. However, its shortcomings, particularly regarding the fusion of powers and minority representation, highlight the need for a careful balance between national unity and regional autonomy, as well as between executive authority and legislative oversight.

The discourse around restructuring Nigeria, with reference to the 1963 Constitution, is inherently linked to the quest for a governance model that ensures national cohesion, equitable resource distribution, and the accommodation of Nigeria’s diverse ethnic groups within a single national identity. The 1963 Constitution, in its time, represented an effort to create a framework that balanced the powers between the federal government and the regions, which is a central theme in today’s restructuring debates.

In considering the 1963 Constitution as a potential model for restructuring, it’s crucial to adapt its principles to the current context, recognizing the significant changes in Nigeria’s socio-political landscape over the past decades. Modern Nigeria faces complex challenges, including but not limited to, insurgencies, economic inequalities, and ethnic tensions, which were not as pronounced during the era of the 1963 Constitution.

The call for restructuring often encompasses a wide range of proposals, including but not limited to:

• Devolution of Powers: Transferring more powers from the federal government to the states to enable them to address local needs more effectively.
• Fiscal Federalism: Allowing states to generate and control more of their resources, contributing to the federal government but retaining a significant portion for local development.
• State and Local Governance: Enhancing the capacities of state and local governments to deliver services and govern more effectively.
• Electoral Reforms: Ensuring more transparent, equitable, and representative electoral processes.
• Security Sector Reform: Tailoring security arrangements to be more locally responsive and better integrated with national security structures.

The constitutional arrangements under the 1963 Constitution, including its merits and demerits, suggest that while it may offer valuable lessons for the current restructuring debate, any move towards adopting or adapting its principles must be carefully considered to address the complexities of Nigeria’s contemporary political, social, and ethnic landscape.

The potential of the 1963 Constitution to serve as a framework for restructuring Nigeria hinges on understanding both its historical context and its specific provisions. This Constitution represented Nigeria’s final break from colonial governance structures, establishing a fully sovereign national framework with a president as head of state, and marked a significant step towards self-determination. It laid down a federal structure designed to manage the country’s ethnic and regional diversity, which is crucial for any discussion on restructuring today.

For restructuring to be meaningful and effective, it must be based on a broad consensus that recognizes Nigeria’s diversity as a strength rather than a weakness. This involves engaging in inclusive dialogues that encompass the wide spectrum of Nigerian society, including government bodies, civil society, traditional institutions, the private sector, and other stakeholders.

In essence, while the 1963 Constitution provides historical insights and a reference point for discussions on restructuring, the path forward requires a contemporary approach that is responsive to the needs and aspirations of all Nigerians. This entails crafting a governance model that is flexible, resilient, and adaptable to the challenges and opportunities of the 21st century, ensuring that Nigeria can achieve its potential as a unified, prosperous, and equitable nation.

Chimazuru Nnadi-Oforgu

Duruebube Uzii na Abosi