Imo State remains a grouping of fragmented and disengaged clans that have been drowned in socio-economic quagmires through tribalized clannism and Abuja politicized democratic kakistocracy. This has left the state with endemic bad leadership, the enthronement of electoral fraud, corruption, and mediocrity.
Since the dawn of the Fourth Republic in 1999, Imo State has suffered a prolonged period of substandard governance, earning an unfortunate reputation as the kakistocracy capital of Nigeria. This term, describing a government run by the least qualified and most unscrupulous individuals, has become synonymous with the leadership in Imo State, reflecting a chronic pattern of ineptitude and mismanagement.
The past two decades have been marked by a succession of administrations in Imo State, each seemingly worse than the last. From Achike Udenwa’s tenure to Rochas Okorocha’s controversial eight years to the present, the state has experienced a series of leadership failures. These leaders, many argue, have been chosen not for their vision or capabilities, but rather through the influence of external powers and the ruling political parties in Abuja.
This string of poor leadership has led to significant developmental stagnation in Imo State. Infrastructure projects remain incomplete or poorly executed, educational standards have declined, and healthcare services are grossly inadequate. The state, once a beacon of hope in the South East, now grapples with hopeless and misguided unemployed youth, dilapidated internal roads and a lack of critical infrastructure and amenities.
A critical issue exacerbating this problem is the method by which these leaders are selected. Political parties, often devoid of ideology and moral grounding, impose candidates on the people on all levels. These candidates are chosen based on loyalty to party hierarchies rather than their competence or commitment to serving the people. The result is a leadership that prioritizes personal gain and political survival over the welfare of the state’s residents and its development.
Furthermore, Imo State is the only state in the South East that does not have a formula for managing its political and cultural diversity. This lack of a cohesive strategy contributes to its disorderly and uncouth political disposition every election cycle, exacerbating the existing challenges and making governance even more chaotic.
This governance crisis is further compounded by the moral bankruptcy of those in power. Electoral fraud and corruption run rampant, with public funds frequently diverted for private use. Accountability is virtually nonexistent, and the rule of law is often flouted with impunity. Such a toxic political environment stifles innovation, discourages investment, and undermines the potential for meaningful progress.
For Imo State to break free from this vicious cycle, there must be a concerted effort to reclaim the political process from the clutches of unscrupulous internal and external influences. The citizens of Imo State need to rise and demand for transparency, accountability, and genuine commitment from their leaders. Political parties must be forced to reform to prioritize ideological coherence and ethical leadership over factional loyalty and nepotism.
Imo State stands at a crossroads. The path it takes going foward will determine whether it continues to languish under kakistocratic rule or rises to achieve its true potential. The onus is on the people of Imo State to demand transparency, hold their leaders accountable, advocate for systemic reforms, and insist on governance that truly serves the public interest. Only then can Imo State shed its unfortunate title and embark on a new era of development and prosperity.
I stand to be challenged if all i’ve stated here is found to be untrue or persecuted as usual if the intention is to silence my views.
I am a very frustrated imo indigene hoping for the best for my state.
Hon Chima Nnadi-Oforgu
Duruebube Uzii na Abosi
OBLONG MEDIA UNLIMITED 
Leave a comment