As the world grapples with the aftermath of the October 7, 2023, attacks and Israel’s brutal military response, many are left questioning the true origins and intent behind these escalating conflicts. This isn’t the first time war has been framed in a way to suit political motives, and false flag operations—historically used to manipulate public opinion—continue to play a central role in modern warfare.
James Morcan aptly notes that to prepare a populace for war, leaders often cultivate an atmosphere of fear, hatred, or mistrust. Whether the target is another nation, religion, or group, the goal is the same: to justify violence under the guise of self-defense or moral righteousness. Benjamin Netanyahu, Israel’s long-standing prime minister, has been a master of this approach, famously stating in 2010 that “America is a thing you can move very easily, move it in the right direction.” His statement captures a larger truth: nations can be influenced, narratives can be shaped, and conflicts can be engineered to suit political ends.
The ongoing conflict between Israel and Palestine, punctuated by periodic escalations of violence, is no exception. What we see today is not merely an isolated outbreak of violence but the continuation of a long-standing geopolitical chess game. The October 7th Hamas operation, named Al-Aqsa Deluge, came as a shock to many observers, but in hindsight, this “surprise” was far from unpredictable. In fact, it raises troubling questions about whether the Israeli government was truly unaware of the impending attack or whether it benefited from ignoring the warnings.
History shows that clashes between Hamas and Israel have erupted before, most notably in 2021 and earlier in 2023. In both instances, violence escalated following tensions at the Al-Aqsa mosque, with both sides suffering heavy casualties. By now, such clashes have become part of a predictable cycle, and yet, when Hamas launched its rocket attack on October 7, 2023, Israeli officials claimed they were caught off guard. Was this incompetence, or something more deliberate?
Critics point to a false flag operation—a strategy where one party orchestrates an attack to justify a much larger military response. In this case, Netanyahu’s government could have used Hamas’s actions as a convenient pretext to launch a full-scale military campaign aimed at “changing the reality on the ground,” as stated by Israeli Defense Minister Yoav Gallant. The rapid and overwhelming nature of Israel’s military response suggests that this was no hasty, reactive measure. Instead, it appears to have been a well-prepared offensive, initiated under the guise of self-defense.
Adding to this theory, reports have emerged that Egypt’s intelligence minister warned Netanyahu of a possible Hamas attack days before October 7th. The Israeli government, however, dismissed these warnings. Why? Was this an oversight, or did Netanyahu deliberately ignore them to leverage the resulting chaos for political and military gain?
This would not be the first time a leader has allowed a crisis to unfold for personal or political reasons. Netanyahu’s government, elected in late 2022, is the most right-wing in Israeli history, and his coalition is deeply aligned with far-right Zionist groups advocating for the annexation of the West Bank. Domestically, Netanyahu has faced massive protests over his controversial judicial reforms. In the midst of growing unpopularity, a large-scale war could shift the public focus, rally national support, and, conveniently, silence dissent.
On the other side of the Atlantic, U.S. President Joe Biden, a staunch ally of Israel, has his own political reasons to support the ongoing military campaign. Biden, who has publicly declared himself a Zionist and has decades of friendship with Netanyahu, has committed unprecedented military aid to Israel. In a political environment where Biden faces weak approval ratings and a looming 2024 election, support for Israel’s war efforts provides an opportunity to bolster his image as a strong leader in foreign policy.
Yet, the stakes in this conflict go beyond political survival. The Gaza Strip sits near a significant natural gas deposit, the Gaza Marine, which has been the subject of negotiations between Israel, Egypt, and the Palestinian Authority. The exploitation of these resources, crucial to both sides, adds another layer of complexity to the already volatile region. It is difficult to separate the economic motives from the military actions unfolding before us.
As the world watches this “new” phase of Israeli-Palestinian violence, it becomes evident that the conflict is driven by far more than the stated reasons of self-defense or vengeance. This war—like many others before it—benefits powerful actors on both sides, while the civilians trapped in Gaza continue to suffer. The international community must ask difficult questions: Who truly benefits from these wars? How much of the narrative presented to us is real, and how much is manipulated?
In the end, the conflict may serve as a distraction from deeper issues, but the human toll cannot be ignored. Civilians, particularly children, are bearing the brunt of these military actions, and international law continues to be violated on all fronts. The atrocities being committed are both immoral and illegal, yet global powers appear more interested in political maneuvering than in securing peace.
As we reflect on these events, one chilling lesson emerges: unchecked power, whether it be wielded by states or by terrorist organizations, represents an existential threat to civilization and world peace. Both sides must be held accountable, and the cycle of violence must be broken before more innocent lives are lost.
OBLONG MEDIA UNLIMITED 
Leave a comment