It is undeniable that Donald Trump has become one of the most polarizing figures in modern history, and in many respects, he has been unfairly vilified on an unprecedented scale. From the moment he announced his candidacy, throughout his presidency, and even after leaving office, Trump has been the subject of relentless media attacks, personal insults, and political hostility that no other modern political figure seems to have faced.
One could argue that the level of scrutiny and condemnation aimed at Trump far exceeds what should be expected, even in a fiercely competitive political environment. While it’s fair to criticize leaders for their policies or decisions, the manner in which Trump has been caricatured and demonized is far beyond the norm. He has been called everything from a fascist to a threat to democracy itself—labels that, when stripped of context, distort the nuance of the man and his presidency.
Consider the way Trump’s every word and action was dissected, often in the most negative light possible. The media, especially during his presidency, rarely gave him the benefit of the doubt. Whether it was his stance on immigration, foreign policy, or the handling of the pandemic, the dominant narrative seemed to be that Trump was always in the wrong. The Charlottesville “very fine people” hoax, where his comments were selectively edited to falsely suggest he supported white supremacists, stands as a clear example of media distortion contributing to his vilification.
Moreover, Trump’s persona as a brash, unapologetic figure didn’t win him favors among political elites or media commentators, but should that justify the level of venom directed at him? It’s one thing to oppose a politician’s policies, but quite another to engage in character assassination, as we saw repeatedly with Trump. This consistent barrage of attacks has led to a widespread perception of Trump as a villainous figure, regardless of his actual achievements or failures.
Contrast this treatment with that of Kamala Harris, the current vice president, who has also been a highly controversial figure. Harris has been a vocal critic of Trump, even engaging in some of the insults and invective that surrounded his presidency. However, there is an emerging narrative that suggests she should somehow be spared from the kind of harsh treatment Trump received because she’s a woman. This begs the question: why should Harris, who partook in the very rhetoric that contributed to Trump’s vilification, be shielded from similar criticism?
If one is to argue for fairness in political discourse, shouldn’t the same standards apply to all? Harris, like Trump, is a public figure, and her policies and decisions are open to scrutiny, her flaws are legion. Yet, we often see a hesitancy to apply the same intensity of criticism to her, despite the fact that she, too, has faced accusations ranging from her controversial affairs, her record as California’s attorney general to her frequent flip-flopping on key issues as a senator and vice president. The fact that Harris occupies a prominent political position and has engaged in the same political battleground as Trump makes it difficult to justify why she should be exempt from the insults and criticisms that have been so freely directed at Trump.
It seems that the selective outrage and double standards at play in modern political discourse contribute to the notion that Trump is uniquely and unjustly vilified. His detractors have been relentless, while figures like Harris are given more leniency, even when their actions or positions warrant scrutiny. If we are to have a truly open and fair political debate, it must involve holding all leaders accountable—without exception.
In the end, the question isn’t whether Trump or Harris should be criticized—both should, when necessary—but rather why the vitriol has been so lopsided. Trump’s vilification stands as one of the most striking examples of how political biases and media narratives can shape public perception, often unfairly. If we can vilify one leader with such intensity, we must be willing to hold others to the same standard. Anything less is hypocrisy.
Duruebube Uzii na Abosi
Chima Nnadi-Oforgu
http://www.oblongmedia.net
#oblongmedia
OBLONG MEDIA UNLIMITED 
Leave a comment