In a move that has reignited debates about presidential term limits, Republican Representative Andy Ogles has introduced a resolution seeking to amend the US Constitution to allow former and current presidents to serve for three terms. The proposal, introduced on Thursday, challenges the long-standing precedent set by the 22nd Amendment, which limits individuals to two terms in the White House.
Under the current constitutional framework, “No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice.” However, Ogles’ resolution proposes to revise this restriction to read: “No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than three times…”, effectively opening the door for Donald Trump to potentially seek a third term in office.
A Push for Trump’s Continued Leadership
Justifying his proposed amendment, Ogles hailed Trump as a transformative leader, arguing that his leadership is essential for the country’s future.
> “President Trump has proven himself to be the only figure in modern history capable of reversing our nation’s decay and restoring America to greatness, and he must be given the time necessary to accomplish that goal,” Ogles stated.
He further stressed the need for legislators to provide Trump with every possible resource to combat what he describes as the “disastrous course” set by the Biden administration.
> “He is dedicated to restoring the republic and saving our country, and we, as legislators and as states, must do everything in our power to support him,” Ogles added.
Trump’s Position on a Third Term
Donald Trump, during his 2024 campaign and subsequent re-election, had previously dismissed suggestions that he might seek a third term. However, in typical Trump fashion, he later entertained the idea in a lighthearted manner, telling Republican lawmakers:
> “I suspect I won’t be running again, unless you do something. Unless you say, ‘he’s so good, we have to just figure it out.’”
This off-the-cuff remark, while seemingly made in jest, has fueled speculation among supporters and critics alike about Trump’s long-term ambitions and his potential desire to extend his influence beyond the constitutional constraints.
Trump’s Immediate Policy Actions and Republican Endorsement
Since his return to office, Trump has wasted no time in issuing a series of executive orders, focusing on key Republican priorities, including:
Border Security: Stricter enforcement measures at the southern border.
Gender Identity Policy: Restricting official recognition to only male and female identities.
Energy Independence: Reviving domestic energy production initiatives.
WHO Withdrawal: Pulling the US out of the World Health Organization, citing concerns over sovereignty and accountability.
These executive actions have been widely praised by Ogles and other Republican lawmakers, who view them as steps toward “restoring America’s values” and undoing what they see as the failures of the previous administration.
Historical Context: The Precedent Set by the 22nd Amendment
The 22nd Amendment, which Ogles seeks to amend, was ratified in 1951 following the unprecedented four-term presidency of Franklin D. Roosevelt (FDR). Roosevelt’s tenure (1933-1945) saw the nation through the Great Depression and World War II, but his prolonged leadership raised concerns about the potential for unchecked executive power.
After FDR’s death in 1945, the American public, reflecting on the wisdom of George Washington, embraced the idea that limiting presidential terms was crucial to preserving democracy. Washington, the first US president and a revered founding father, voluntarily stepped down after two terms, setting a precedent that was later formalized into law.
The Road Ahead: Political Implications and Challenges
Despite the enthusiasm from Ogles and Trump’s staunch supporters, the proposed amendment faces significant hurdles in both Congress and public opinion. Amending the Constitution requires:
1. Two-thirds majority approval in both the House of Representatives and the Senate.
2. Ratification by three-fourths of the state legislatures (38 out of 50 states).
Given the current political climate and the Republicans’ slim three-seat majority in the House, passing such an amendment will likely be an uphill battle. Additionally, the proposal is expected to face strong opposition from Democrats and some moderate Republicans who view term limits as a safeguard against authoritarianism and power consolidation.
Critics’ Perspective: A Threat to Democratic Norms?
Opponents argue that removing term limits could open the door to authoritarian tendencies, allowing future presidents to entrench themselves in power indefinitely. They cite Washington’s original warnings that prolonged rule could lead to a de facto monarchy or dictatorship.
Democrats and constitutional scholars have already voiced concerns, warning that such a move could undermine the principles of checks and balances that define the American democratic system.
Conclusion: A Symbolic Gesture or a Serious Attempt?
While Ogles’ proposed amendment may reflect the deep loyalty Trump commands within the Republican Party, the likelihood of its passage remains uncertain. Whether this effort is a serious legislative push or a symbolic political gesture to rally the GOP base, it undeniably underscores Trump’s continued influence over the party and the broader national discourse.
In the coming months, this proposal will likely serve as a litmus test for the strength of Trump’s hold on the Republican establishment and the extent to which the party is willing to challenge long-standing constitutional norms in pursuit of their political agenda.
OBLONG MEDIA UNLIMITED 
Leave a comment