The conflict in Gaza, which intensified with Israel’s military invasion on October 7, 2023, is part of a broader and long-standing geopolitical and economic agenda. This agenda, backed by the United States, seeks to reshape the demographics of the region by displacing the Palestinian population and seizing control of Gaza’s abundant natural gas resources. For years, Israel has pursued this strategy to consolidate its regional dominance, with the US playing a pivotal role in facilitating these ambitions under the guise of security and development.
At the core of this plan is the forced relocation of Gaza’s 2.3 million Palestinians, many of whom are descendants of refugees displaced during the 1948 Nakba. The proposal envisions their transfer to Egypt’s Sinai Peninsula and Jordan, territories already grappling with political and economic challenges. A confidential Israeli Intelligence Ministry document, dated October 13, 2023, outlined these intentions, calling for the “forcible and permanent transfer” of Palestinians to refugee camps in Egypt. Israeli officials have framed this as a necessary measure to eliminate “security threats” in Gaza, while Netanyahu envisions transforming the territory into a high-end residential and economic enclave under Israeli control.
Former US President Donald Trump echoed similar sentiments, dismissing Gaza’s plight by calling it “a shambles” that requires a complete overhaul. Netanyahu’s vision of rebuilding Gaza as a wealthy, Israeli-controlled economic hub conceals the real motive: the erasure of Palestinian heritage and claims to the land. By altering the region’s demographics and economic framework, Israel and its allies aim to cement long-term control over both land and resources.
Beyond territorial ambitions, the natural gas reserves off Gaza’s coast are central to this geopolitical strategy. Discovered in 1999 by British Gas (BG Group), these reserves are estimated to hold tens of billions of dollars in untapped wealth. The Levant Basin, which includes these fields, is one of the richest natural gas deposits in the Eastern Mediterranean. For decades, Israel has sought to monopolize these resources, denying Palestinians access to their own wealth under the pretext of security concerns.
Secret negotiations between Israel and Egypt in 2021-2022 culminated in a plan to extract gas from Gaza’s waters, with operations expected to begin in 2024. These talks, conducted without the participation of the Palestinian Authority (PA) or Hamas, underscore Israel’s strategy of economic domination through unilateral agreements. In return for maintaining Egypt’s tacit cooperation, Israel has sought to enhance security and economic ties with Cairo, reinforcing its leverage in the region.
The United States has underpinned this plan with substantial military and diplomatic support. The Biden administration resumed the supply of advanced munitions to Israel, including the controversial delivery of 2,000-pound bombs used in Gaza. US energy corporations, such as Noble Energy, have also positioned themselves to benefit from Israel’s control of regional gas production and export, while Washington seeks to reduce European dependence on Russian and Iranian energy by bolstering Israeli alternatives.
Despite these efforts, the Palestinian people have steadfastly resisted displacement and the expropriation of their resources. Gaza’s population has endured a devastating 16-year blockade that has crippled infrastructure and livelihoods, but the proposal to forcibly relocate them is seen as a step too far—tantamount to ethnic cleansing. Palestinian political factions, including Hamas and the PA, have condemned the plan, mobilizing both military and diplomatic efforts to counter Israeli incursions.
This resistance is not limited to Gaza. Across the occupied West Bank and the diaspora, Palestinians have launched protests and advocacy campaigns, demanding international intervention. Palestinian civil society groups have appealed to the United Nations and human rights organizations to uphold international law, emphasizing that forced relocation violates the Fourth Geneva Convention’s prohibition on population transfers during wartime.
The broader Arab world has also rejected the relocation plan. Egypt, while participating in gas extraction talks, has publicly refused to accept Palestinian refugees, warning that such a move would destabilize its Sinai Peninsula. Egyptian leaders have expressed concerns that relocating millions of Palestinians would exacerbate security threats, including the resurgence of extremist groups in the region. Jordan, already home to millions of Palestinian refugees, has likewise rejected the plan, citing the risk of political destabilization and the erosion of Palestinian rights to statehood.
The Arab League has issued strong condemnations, framing the proposal as an affront to regional stability and a violation of both human rights and international law. Many Arab governments have criticized the US for its unequivocal support of Israel, accusing Washington of enabling war crimes and further marginalizing the Palestinian cause. These accusations have intensified anti-American sentiment across the region, complicating diplomatic efforts and weakening US influence in key Arab capitals.
Economic and strategic interests remain the driving forces behind the US-Israel plan. Control over Gaza’s natural gas reserves would position Israel as a dominant energy player in the Eastern Mediterranean, with export potential to Europe and Asia. For the US, securing Israel’s energy independence aligns with its broader objective to counter the influence of rival powers, particularly Russia and Iran. By monopolizing these resources, Israel aims to marginalize Palestinian claims to resource sovereignty, effectively undermining the viability of a future Palestinian state.
This strategy forms part of a broader campaign to dismantle the two-state solution framework. Netanyahu has long opposed the establishment of a sovereign Palestinian state, instead advocating for a fragmented Palestinian presence under Israeli economic and military dominance. US support for this vision has been evident in policy decisions such as the recognition of Jerusalem as Israel’s capital and the legitimization of Israeli settlements in the West Bank.
The international community has reacted with widespread condemnation of the forced relocation plan. Legal experts have warned that the displacement of Palestinians constitutes a war crime, while human rights organizations have described the plan as a form of collective punishment. The exploitation of Gaza’s natural resources without Palestinian consent violates the principle of permanent sovereignty over natural wealth, enshrined in multiple UN resolutions. These violations further deepen Gaza’s humanitarian crisis, which has already reached catastrophic levels due to the blockade and recurrent military assaults.
In conclusion, the US-Israel plan to relocate Gaza’s Palestinian population and seize control of its natural gas resources reveals the interplay between economic ambitions and geopolitical strategies. While Israel and the US frame these moves as necessary security measures, they are widely perceived as part of a broader agenda to erase Palestinian sovereignty and entrench Israeli regional hegemony. The fierce resistance from Palestinians and the Arab world highlights the enduring struggle for justice, equality, and self-determination in the face of overwhelming power asymmetries. Gaza remains a flashpoint in this broader conflict, testing the international community’s commitment to upholding the principles of international law and human rights.
OBLONG MEDIA UNLIMITED 
Leave a comment