On June 13, 2025, Israel unleashed a wave of precision strikes across Iranian territory. The world barely had time to absorb the shock before U.S. President Donald J. Trump urged Tehran to “return to the negotiating table.” But what is there to negotiate when bombs are already falling? What credibility do talks hold when they occur under the shadow of firepower and premeditated sabotage?
This is not diplomacy, it is a performance of power masquerading as peace. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, cloaked in the familiar language of “freedom” and “self-defense,” seeks to reduce a sovereign civilization to submission. But the Israeli-American axis forgets one thing: Iran is not a post-colonial vassal. It is an ancient civilization that remembers, resists, and, increasingly, recalibrates its red lines.
The Politics of Bombs and Betrayal
The strikes came even as negotiations over Iran’s nuclear program continued in Vienna. What kind of diplomacy requires the flattening of oil depots and the assassination of scientists? This moment will be remembered not as a failure of talks but as their betrayal. A day when Washington and Tel Aviv proved that dialogue was never the goal, coercion was.
In return, what did Israel hope for? Regime change? An Iran that suddenly warms up to its Zionist adversary? That fantasy is delusional. No self-respecting nation would watch its generals assassinated, its nuclear scientists targeted, and its cities bombed without seeking a deterrent. Hence the growing Iranian public call for a nuclear arsenal, not to attack, but to survive.
And survive it must. For the Islamic Republic, history has not been kind. From the CIA-MI6-backed 1953 coup against Prime Minister Mossadegh to the West’s arming of Saddam Hussein during the Iran-Iraq war, Tehran has faced foreign hostility for daring to chart an independent path.
The Samson Option: Israel’s Nuclear Sword of Damocles
While Israel remains the Middle East’s only undeclared nuclear power, with an estimated 400 warheads, it lectures others on regional stability. Netanyahu’s own words are revealing: “If Israel falls, the world falls.” A not-so-veiled reference to the Samson Option, the Israeli doctrine of massive retaliation, even if it leads to global catastrophe.
But is that doctrine still limited to nuclear bombs? With Israel’s dominance in cybersecurity, it’s plausible the Samson Option includes digital doomsday protocols: kill-switches embedded in software powering pacemakers, air traffic control systems, banking infrastructure, and nuclear facilities. Think Stuxnet, but global.
To dismiss this as conspiracy theory is to forget that Israel’s tech sector is deeply embedded in global infrastructure. The question then becomes: how far would Israel go to preserve its hegemony?
A Nuclear Iran: Realist Logic, Not Apocalyptic Folly
In 2012, famed political scientist Kenneth Waltz published a groundbreaking piece titled “Why Iran Should Get the Bomb”. Waltz argued that nuclear parity in the Middle East would not ignite war, but suppress it. Just as mutual deterrence keeps India and Pakistan in check, so too would it restrain Israel and Iran.
That logic is now more compelling than ever. A nuclear Iran would rely less on proxies like Hezbollah or Hamas and more on deterrence. It would finally force Israel to think twice before launching preemptive strikes or assassinations. More importantly, it would rebalance the strategic equation in a region long dominated by one rogue actor with unchecked nuclear might.
Critics say this could trigger a nuclear arms race, with Saudi Arabia possibly following suit. Yet, Riyadh has long financed Pakistan’s nuclear program, and credible reports suggest Pakistani warheads may already be stationed in the kingdom. In short, the race has already begun, quietly, under Western supervision.
Game Theory and the Road to Ruin
What if Israel wins this war of attrition? Will a puppet regime in Tehran bring peace? Highly unlikely. A false flag event blamed on “Iranian sleeper cells” could justify U.S. intervention, especially under a more hawkish American administration. If chaos erupts around Jerusalem’s Temple Mount, Iran could even be blamed for destroying Islam’s third holiest site, dividing the Muslim world along sectarian lines and clearing the path for the construction of a Third Temple, a long-held Zionist fantasy.
The wider Muslim world must recognize the stakes. Today it is Iran; tomorrow, it could be nuclear-armed Pakistan. Netanyahu has not hidden his disdain for “militant Islamic regimes,” and Israel has cultivated quiet ties with the Pakistani military since the 1980s. When the time comes, transactional alliances will mean nothing.
Zionist Dreams, Apocalyptic Ends
At the heart of Israel’s aggressive posture is not just security, but theology. The idea of a Greater Israel, stretching from the Nile to the Euphrates, is not fringe. It is documented and discussed by Israeli leaders and ideologues alike. The destruction of Iran, the balkanization of Arab states, and the pacification of Mecca and Medina all serve this messianic vision.
General Wesley Clark’s 2007 revelation that Iran was the last in a series of seven countries the U.S. planned to destabilize post-9/11 is now playing out. The pretext may be nukes. The real motive is dominance.
Between Survival and Submission
The question now is simple: Can Iran survive without the ultimate deterrent?
The answer may no longer lie in moral restraint, international law, or multilateral forums. Those institutions have failed Iran too many times. If Israel’s doctrine is deterrence through destruction, perhaps Iran has no choice but to respond with deterrence through possession.
A nuclear-armed Iran may not bring peace, but it will bring caution. And in a region intoxicated by impunity, that may be the first step toward sanity.
God help us if reason fails.
But may God help Iran more, if survival demands what history now makes inevitable.
Published by Oblong Media Unlimited
Visit: http://www.oblongmedia.net
For inquiries: oblongmedialtd@gmail.com
OBLONG MEDIA UNLIMITED 
Leave a comment