
Building a Functional Alaigbo Inside a Dysfunctional Nigeria
If Abuja Won’t Build Alaigbo, Alaigbo Will Build Alaigbo
Development in Alaigbo has been throttled for decades not by a lack of capacity, imagination or resources, but by an overdependence on federal permissions that never arrive. In a country where central approvals move at glacial speed, and sometimes not at all, waiting for Abuja has become a slow death sentence for regional infrastructure. Yet across the world, regions, provinces and city states in similar situations have learned how to unlock transformation under a hostile or indifferent central government simply by changing the rules of engagement. This is the emerging playbook.
The Igbo challenge is not capability. Igbo states have world-class assets: diaspora capital measured in billions, a deep reservoir of commercial energy, exceptional engineering talent, a culture of entrepreneurship and execution, and a manufacturing backbone stretching from Aba to Nnewi. What the region lacks is institutional permission. Federal bottlenecks, fragmented state politics and limited fiscal power have produced a culture of begging for approvals instead of building systems that function without them. The strategic pivot is to stop asking for permission and start unleashing capacity under constitutional powers already available to the states.
One major pathway is the creation of regional infrastructure compacts, legal agreements among the South East states to jointly build and operate core services such as electricity, water, rail, industrial corridors, broadband and investment protection. This does not require federal sign off if framed as state collaboration in service delivery. The result is a mini-EU inside Nigeria: shared rules, shared infrastructure, shared regulation, and shared enforcement. In plain language, it allows Alaigbo to behave like a single development bloc instead of five isolated administrative units.
A second pathway is to build outside government budgets. Federal bottlenecks mainly strangle public finance, not private capital. Globally, major infrastructure has been delivered through special purpose vehicles, independent companies funded by diaspora bonds, pension concessions, infrastructure notes, sovereign wealth partners and municipal revenue securitization. This is how Gautrain was built in South Africa, how the Lagos Blue Line became reality after four decades of federal stalling, how the Lekki Free Zone attracted billions in FDI, and how Dubai and Singapore industrialized without waiting for national budgets. Coordination, not permission, is the secret.
States also possess the power to create their own special economic territories. Instead of lobbying Abuja for slow moving federal SEZs, Alaigbo can declare thematic innovation zones by state laws: a garment and leather zone in Aba, an automotive and component manufacturing belt in Nnewi, tech and robotics in the FUTO axis, creative industries in Owerri, pharmaceuticals in the Orlu belt. Shenzhen began this way, not as a top down Beijing initiative, but as a radical provincial experiment that Beijing later embraced when the results became undeniable.
Perhaps the most transformative bypass is power. Electricity remains the ultimate choke point for manufacturing and productivity. Recent constitutional amendments have quietly opened the door for state level generation, transmission and distribution. A regional power pool supplying factories, industrial parks, SMEs and commercial districts would trigger a manufacturing revival, draw diaspora supply chains back home, create hundreds of thousands of jobs and restore the region’s historic export advantages. This is exactly how Gujarat in India posted 30% industrial growth after solving its power crisis.
Beyond capital and energy lies another underutilized asset: the diaspora. No other region in Black Africa possesses a diaspora with comparable wealth, technical capacity and emotional commitment. The diaspora has funded states in crisis before: Israel through long term bonds, India through deposits and property backed funds, Rwanda through cooperative diaspora banks, Lebanon through angel investment networks. Alaigbo can do the same. Twenty billion dollars in diaspora-driven financing over a decade is not a fantasy; it is an achievable baseline if structured properly.
What makes this playbook viable is the nature of infrastructure that does not require Abuja. With the exception of deep sea ports and aviation, states and private actors can build intra state rail, city BRT systems, logistics hubs, dry ports, inland container depots, expressways, bridges, fiber backbones, data centers, smart grids, tax and ID systems, industrial parks, fuel depots, factories, cold chains, irrigation networks and agricultural terminals. The list is long because the constitutional space is much wider than most assume.
The real turbocharger, however, is municipal sovereignty. Nigeria is over-centralized at the federal level but radically underdeveloped at the city level. In the modern world, cities, not nations, are the primary engines of economic power. Dubai, Hong Kong, Singapore, Kigali and Shenzhen were all city projects before they became national showcase miracles. Aba, Enugu, Onitsha, Owerri, Nnewi and Abakaliki have the population density, commercial scale and industrial DNA to operate as economic city states if granted municipal authority to regulate zoning, concessions, borrowing, utilities and taxation. Cities do not need secession to prosper; they only need autonomy to operate.
If all this is true, why is it not happening? The region possesses entrepreneurship, capital, creative energy and manufacturing instincts, but lacks elite coordination, unified regional planning and institutional vehicles for scale. Private led development, the Igbo strength, excels at agility but struggles with infrastructure scale. That gap can only be filled by institutions: a regional development authority to coordinate land, power, mobility, capital and industry; a regional sovereign fund seeded by diaspora, pensions and exports; and a regional planning bureau to standardize zoning, taxation, policy and procurement. This is the same template used by the Eastern Nigeria Development Corporation under M.I. Okpara, which built the most advanced subnational economy in Africa before the war. What was destroyed after 1970 was not a failure but a success deemed too threatening to survive.
Alaigbo does not need political secession to prosper. It needs to secede from dependence, from the approval culture, from federal permission economics, from the psychological defeatism of waiting for Abuja to validate Igbo destiny. When the region begins to plan like a state, govern like a city, invest like a corporation and capitalize like a diaspora nation, it will stop asking for equity and start creating value. That is how you become Dubai in Black Africa and Shenzhen in West Africa.
By Hon. Chima Nnadi-Oforgu
Duruebube Uzii na Abosi

Leave a comment