An investigative report.
For more than a decade, Nigeria’s South East has existed in a disturbing paradox: a region officially at peace, yet governed as a conflict zone; constitutionally Nigerian, yet treated as a hostile frontier. What has unfolded is not merely a failure of security or an accidental breakdown of order. It is a pattern, deliberate, cumulative, and destabilizing, with profound consequences for youth radicalization, economic paralysis, and national cohesion.
This report examines the architecture of that crisis.
A Region Placed Under Siege
In 2017, the federal government launched “Operation Python dance a military deployment presented as an internal security measure. In practice, it militarized the South East in a manner unmatched in other regions facing equal or even more severe security challenges.
Armored vehicles entered civilian communities. Young men were profiled, detained, and in numerous cases killed. The psychological message was unmistakable: the region itself had become suspect.
Rather than calming tensions, the deployment hardened them.
For a generation of Igbo youth, many born decades after the civil war, the Nigerian state began to appear not as a protector, but as an occupying force.
From Political Grievance to Criminal Label
The “IPOB” emerged from long standing political grievances rooted in post war marginalization, exclusion from national power structures, and chronic infrastructural neglect.
Instead of addressing these grievances politically, the state opted for securitization. IPOB was proscribed and labeled a terrorist organization.
The consequences were severe. Thousands of young people were swept into mass arrests, prolonged detentions, and extrajudicial encounters. Political dissent was reframed as terrorism. Protest was criminalized. Entire communities were stigmatized.
Notably, several international observers, including voices in the United States and Israel, have publicly questioned the terrorist designation of “Nnamdi Kanu”, drawing a clear distinction between political agitation and transnational terror networks. That distinction, however, has been largely ignored within Nigeria.
The Violence Nobody Wants Investigated
Another troubling silence surrounds the fate of police infrastructure destroyed across Imo State. The question that must be asked, and answered publicly, is simple: were there budgetary allocations by the federal or state governments for the reconstruction of these police stations, and if so, where did the funds go?
If no such allocations were made, that in itself is an indictment. If allocations were made, then the absence of rebuilt stations points to something far more serious, diversion, abandonment, or deliberate policy neglect. Either scenario demands a transparent investigation, not official silence.
What further deepens the contradiction is the claim that these areas remain “no-go zones” due to security concerns. If that is the case, how are elections repeatedly conducted there, often peacefully, with full deployment of security personnel and the eventual declaration of results? The logic collapses under its own weight. A territory secure enough for elections cannot simultaneously be too unsafe for the restoration of permanent security infrastructure.
More disturbing still is the pattern of private efforts to rehabilitate some of these police facilities being quietly frustrated or stalled. This raises legitimate suspicions that the prolonged absence of functional police stations is not merely a failure of capacity, but a consequence of political convenience, institutional inertia, or a preference for controlled insecurity.
A state cannot claim commitment to law and order while allowing critical security infrastructure to decay indefinitely, especially when funds may have been provided and communities are willing to assist. Until these questions are confronted honestly, the narrative of insecurity in Imo State will remain incomplete, and deeply suspect.
Official narratives attribute the wave of prison breaks, police station burnings, and targeted killings in the South East to “unknown gunmen.” Yet critical questions remain conspicuously unanswered:
Why were multiple police facilities attacked after having appeared repeatedly in federal budgets for renovation, budgets that were never executed?
Why were suspects arrested after major attacks reportedly released following the conclusion of police investigations?
Why were privately funded efforts to repair police infrastructure allegedly obstructed, including cases where rebuilt facilities were later destroyed?
Why were private offers to refurbish security equipment, including armored personnel carriers, only partially carried out despite donor payments being made?
These are not idle rumors. They are allegations consistently raised by senior stakeholders and quietly acknowledged within security circles. Yet no independent commission of inquiry has been permitted to follow these questions to their logical end.
Violence thrives where truth is buried.
Economic Suffocation as Policy
Beyond security, the South East suffers a quieter but equally devastating form of pressure: economic obstruction.
Federal infrastructure in the region remains among the most neglected in the country. Major arterial roads are left in permanent disrepair. Rail connectivity is skeletal. Industrial logistics are crippled.
Commerce faces relentless bureaucratic friction: overlapping federal agencies, excessive compliance hurdles, and aggressive enforcement regimes that disproportionately target Igbo owned enterprises. Roadblocks manned by security operatives function less as security checkpoints than as toll gates of extortion.
The outcome is predictable. Capital flees. Industries relocate. Entrepreneurs retreat. Youth unemployment deepens.
Destabilization, in this context, does not require bombs. It requires sustained neglect.
Divide, Fragment, Neutralize
Perhaps the most enduring strategy has been fragmentation.
The South East is routinely prevented from speaking with one voice. States are pitted against one another. Political elites are incentivized individually, weakening collective bargaining power. Regional institutions are hollowed out or sidelined.
Symbolism matters. The fact that the first international flight from Owerri’s airport was not commercial or trade driven, but a pilgrimage flight, attended by northern traditional authority figures, underscores whose mobility and priorities the system is structurally designed to serve.
A Warning Once Given
Former Central Bank Governor Lamido Sanusi former CBN governor reportedly fell out with sections of the northern establishment after posing a simple but explosive question: How does Nigeria explain to an Igbo youth, born long after the civil war, that he is a citizen, yet excluded from opportunities available to others, living under constant suspicion in his own country?
That question remains unanswered.
The Silence of the Governors
No honest investigation into the destabilization of the South East can avoid an uncomfortable truth: every sitting governor in Ala Igbo, without exception, carries political liabilities that weaken their capacity to defend the region.
These liabilities are not abstract. They take the form of federal leverage, compromising political bargains, corruption files quietly held in reserve, and structural dependence on Abuja for political survival.
As a result, governors do not negotiate for Ala Igbo. They manage it, on behalf of a system that distrusts it.
When federal policies choke regional commerce, there is no coordinated resistance.
When youths are profiled, arrested, or killed, there is no unified outrage.
When infrastructure collapses, there is no collective ultimatum.
Instead, there is silence. Fragmentation. Individual survival.
This is not accidental. A politically compromised leadership is easier to neutralize. A divided region is easier to dominate.
Ala Igbo is not leaderless.
It is represented, but not defended.
Youth as Collateral Damage
While governors issue statements and attend federal functions, Igbo youths bear the full weight of a militarized environment they did not create.
Political dissent is labeled extremism.
Economic frustration is treated as criminal intent.
Entire communities are punished for grievances that were never addressed.
The result is predictable: alienation, anger, and radicalization.
When lawful protest is crushed and political dialogue foreclosed, the vacuum is filled by despair, and by actors who profit from chaos.
Rather than interrogate the system that produced this outcome, responsibility is shifted onto the youths themselves.
This inversion of blame is one of the most dangerous elements of the crisis.
Rebuilding Without Slogans
For too long, conversations about the South East have oscillated between denial and nostalgia. What is required now is neither romantic memory nor incendiary rhetoric, but disciplined, institutional reconstruction.
The task before Ala Igbo is not secessionary fantasy, nor blind loyalty to the center.
It is rebuilding.
It requires economic coordination across states, legal and financial protection for regional capital, security frameworks that protect citizens rather than terrorize them, political structures that bargain collectively rather than individually, and a leadership ethic anchored in accountability rather than fear.
Without this, no “connection to the center” will deliver progress. And no level of repression will produce peace.
A New Frame for the Future
Instead of slogans, the moment calls for clarity. Possible framings include:
The Ala Igbo Reconstruction Imperative
Reclaiming the Eastern Engine
Restoring Ala Igbo’s Developmental Spine
Breaking the Cycle of Eastern Marginalisation
The Ala Igbo Question
Ultimately
This moment demands honesty, not comfort.
Until Ala Igbo confronts the truth about its political representation, and until its leadership is forced to choose between personal survival and regional survival, instability will persist, and youths will continue to pay the price for elite silence.
Rebuilding Ala Igbo does not begin with slogans.
It begins with clarity, courage, and collective action.
Oblong Media Unlimited Investigative Desk
OBLONG MEDIA UNLIMITED 
Leave a comment