RE: PETER OBI, SOUTH EAST & 2023 – KEEPING IT HONEST, OBJECTIVE AND REALISTIC BY Dr Uche Diala.

Dr Chris Asoluka

The importance of Dr Uche Diala’s post lies in the need for critical thinking, analysis and strategy. It’s therefore without doubt a bold and courageous alternative view in the usual frenzy of popular nzogbu nzogbu herd mindset which rather than produce relief mostly deepen our affliction.

However, his approach and conclusion failed to present a fresh position but a rather, a rehash of an age long defeatist incremental approach embedded in a narrative of false assumptions, misplaced priorities, and a faulty stereotypical conceptual frame.

Consequently he failed to capture and properly define our problem, let alone its diagnosis. Not surprisingly his solution – or prescription – is a return to the cliche of “half a loaf is better than no bread”. Alas we end up traveling this same familiar route, doing the same thing in the same way and expecting a different result. Well, we are not a mad people as Diala’s prescription fits very well in Albert Einstein’s classic model of madness. Because we are in a season where a lot happens by the seconds, I will summarise my reposte to Diala’s post along a well beaten strategy framework of problem-diagnosis-solution (prescription of coherent actions).

  1. The Problem: Contrary to the view that the marginalisation of South East is the problem to be solved, I argue that it is a symptom and indeed a manifestation of a carefully contrived inferiority complex programmed and foisted on the people as a result of a lost civil war. An underlying psychology of defeat where its people are being consciously reduced and redefined as second class citizens in Nigeria who no longer matter in critical decisionmaking even when the civil war of “no victor, no vanquished” ended some fifty-two years ago.
    Don’t rejoice and be deceived by token gestures, such as Ukiwe’s experience showed. We also recall how Ekwueme was halted when his anticipated emergence and ascendancy to become President of Nigeria by 1987 was considered contrary to their postwar pecking power order. The recent PDP decision on zoning is an eloquent confirmation of the ingrained belief that it’s yet too early to jettison the postwar order and feeling that SE does not matter.
  2. The Diagnosis: Sustainable development in an emerging nation-state such as Nigeria can only be built on the foundation of justice, equity and fairness to all. This creates an environment of opportunity and self actualisation that promotes inclusive growth and development. A socioeconomic environment that is not discriminatory and is rule-based devoid of impunity. Luckily, more Nigerians are waking up to the new reality that impunity, discrimination and double standards stifle growth and development with dire consequences of unemployment, poverty and insecurity. Our problem has morphed, it has engulfed the entire space beyond geopolitical boundaries. The people are hungry and angry and restive. The issue now is how to navigate, taking into account our current situation. Do we do the same things and pray that this time a desired outcome will follow or do we try something new, guided by a sound strategy? Whilst I concede that herd mentality also betrays original causes, I strongly believe that “there is a tide in the affairs of men”; when serendipity falls on your lap, strategise and take a leap! The worst outcome cannot be worse than the present.
  3. The Solution: Prescription woven to take advantage of the current dynamic includes a number of coherent actions:

I. Acceptance of some moves already made in spite of certain weaknesses i.e. Peter Obi’s move and timing to LP;

II. Avoid making the momentum a solely South East narrative as our experience has revealed the wicked, treacherous and prependal tendencies of the ruling class;

III. Though the vent of suffering, anger of the young, and failed expectations of consecutive past governments articulated by Peter Obi and his antecedent bring a refreshing difference and the feeling that “yes we can change the system”, the momentum generated has gone beyond PO the man. It must be acknowledged that it is beyond him and the issue of SE marginalisation, it should now be seen as a Nigerian movement;

IV. While it is advisable to sustain the frenzy for PVC, especially in the SE, the end must not be myopic. The goal is to display our true relevance as now being fully awake and ready to engage, using our numbers decisively to secure our interests through the PVC now and even beyond 2023. That we are shortchanged now is majorly due to our aloofness in matters such as census, voters registration, voting, etc, and misguided signal of what we truly want – a separate entity or to mobilize our real strength to secure our due in Nigeria? Whatever may have been the manipulations of census figures and INEC voter registration must be put to an end. We must show interest and come out in full force. We must send a new signal of engagement, including the consciousness of our collective goals professed by us, whether those residing in the SE and outside the zone. That psychology of acquiescence of second class citizenry ever evident in our collective response, including playing second fiddle, must be discarded today;

V. Our response is not sheepish advocacy for all of SE to become members of LP. However, as one with considerable knowledge and experience in Nigerian politics, I hasten to correct certain erroneous assumptions being peddled by incrementalist strategists. First, that LP does not have the political structure to match PDP and APC is a fallacy. Dormant structures do not mean an absence of structure. The LP, now reenergised, repopulated, and with a feeling of co-ownership by both NLC and TUC has created a more extensive network with passionate membership. We may also recall that the so-called structures and members of the leading parties are disgruntled local footsoldiers who continually feel used and disempowered during the sharing of benefits, case in point, the recent bazaars in Abuja when delegates allegedly went home with bundles of dollars. This ground-force can certainly not be relied upon to continue to do the yeoman’s job – their low moral is a clear rejection of “monkey dey work,”! History has shown that this has affected the fortunes of PDP more than once. The point is that the new LP has the network (structures) and passionate membership waiting to be organised and mobilised in line with the electoral needs.

Secondly, eight months is quite a long time given the fact that before the 2022 Electoral calendar, campaigns did not last beyond two to three months after party primaries.

Finally, there is a difference in the ease of rigging in the pre-BVAS era. I’d rather not go into details, but be rest assured that the abuses inherent in the manual accreditation and use of incident forms during the pre-BVAS era may be thwarted by the instantaneous electronic transmission of results. This all amounts to bad news for those relying on what worked yesterday.

VI. Money plays an important role in politics but does not determine victory – winning is not dependent on who spends the most money. Money could even create dysfunction when people fight and grumble over who got more, rather than enabling an effective deployment. In this season of a particularly biting economy, money could also very easily be redirected into private pockets. In 2023, strategy, engagement and sustained momentum will play the most crucial role to determine victory.

In conclusion, we should define our goal not only achieved by PO becoming President in 2023, but more importantly, to make a strong point that we matter and can influence decisions affecting our interests. We thank PO for being the catalyst for this commonly shared national consciousness that every Nigerian, particularly the ill-treated SE, matters.

Dr. Chris Asoluka
10/06/22

3 thoughts on “RE: PETER OBI, SOUTH EAST & 2023 – KEEPING IT HONEST, OBJECTIVE AND REALISTIC BY Dr Uche Diala.

  1. Response from Uche Diala 👇🏾

    My only take away from this response to my submission is the last paragraph which by the way agrees with the kernel or the substance of my submission. I appreciate that.

    Otherwise Dr Chris Asoluka went academic on a totally political discourse that requires more of practical and realistic thinking, objective analysis and accurate permutation and not arrogant utopian grandstanding.

    By the way, I did not seek to proffer any “solutions”. It is not in my place to so do. I only gave my read of it and what I thought would have being a more realistic path to have taken or to take if possible. Then I gave a word of caution. My apologies if I interloped into their business.

    Dr Asoluka refers to incremental progress as if it is evil. He thinks being Vice President with a strategy and working forward and up from there is infradig and maybe too slow. Does that not prove my advice that we need to learn strategic patience in politics relevant?

    We want it now now, sharp sharp, with no structures within our own control in place. Whoever told Dr Asoluka that he can and will overnight control the NLC structure that owns the Labour Party. Are those workers not the same Nigerians that are driven by the same tribal, religious and corruption driven Nigerian dynamics? Which serious and successful politician succeeds merely by building castles in the someone else’s air?

    Then I’m forced to ask: How did we arrive at today? Because Peter Obi made a sole and personal decision to jump from the PDP a few days to the party Primaries and 8 months to the general election because he suddenly realised Atiku and PDP were corrupt and strange bed mates with him?

    What was he and what were we doing 8, 4 and 2 years ago? Or we didn’t know that there would be an election in 2023? What plans did we make and what structures did he and us build in all that time? We were comfy with the PDP until Peter Obi suddenly realised that his see no evil, hear no evil ideology is not congrous with the PDP’s and suddenly we got in a hurry, jumped into the next available vehicle and voila we are on the march and no one can or should ask questions? I will not be that Igbo man.

    Only a naive politician will think that noise on the streets; no matter how loud or traffic on social media; no matter how high automatically translates to any kind of victory at the polls. But I am not ready to waste my time on people who arrogantly think they know it all and they have got it all worked out. Ndi Eze Onye Agwala m.

    My admonition was for those who get it. Afterall I’m not a Labour Party member like I stated. I can only wish them luck. I was only interested in weighing in because I have clearly seen the attempt to railroad, even to blackmail and intimidate our people once more into a journey with no prior discussion, agreement or consensus which is not different from what we were made to do with the PDP for 16 years and later with IPOB based on Nnamdi Kanu’s sole and personal decision and I felt the need to caution us on time just like I did in 2014/15 and also at the beginning of the Kanu misadventure. How have we fared with both today?

    Anyone amongst us who does not realise that the Peter Obi issue has been framed, projected as if it was an Presidency of SE (knowingly or unknowingly), from within or without; even by the things some of us write, say or share, is either insincere or not observant. Neither is good. I did not do that and I’m not wishing it into being. It is there for all who care to see. If we do not want realize and deal with that early in the day, we will reap the consequences. It is not wishful thinking. Politics is real and brutal in Nigeria.

    My position remains that we (those who have quickly appropriated the Peter Obi adventure to themselves alone) should communicate clearly to our people what their goal is. If it is to make a “statement”, then let them be told clearly and in advance what that statement is and how that statement translates to the same as or equals to winning the Presidency (which is what they have been made to believe) and not winning it.

    You can’t grandstand that you are sure of victory and at the same time say you want to make a statement. The two are clearly not the same in my ignorant thinking.

    I have never played the ostrich and I’m not willing to play the ostrich on this one. Surely I’m not the only one.

    As usual frantic effort is being made to shut out those Igbos who refuse to join the bandwagon without asking the relevant question. They are being tagged, harangued and intimidated and as usual those objective, pragmatic and critical thinking Igbos and alternative voices of reason will keep quiet and the result will be as usual. Like Dr Asoluka asked and I re-echo; who does the same thing over and over and expects a different result? He knows the answer to that.

    I’m done.

    Dr Uche Diala

    Like

  2. Dr. Diala my review was not intended to be “academic” and denial of his views but the need for further interrogation. I sincerely thank him for sharing his trepidation about possible implications of abuses of the PO phenomenal leap. However my position is for us to examine and distil the true essence of the moment. PO as an idea is widely perceived by the young all over the country as evidence for good governance. PO the man, of course, has his faults, but has generated a POTENTIAL national momentum. The question now is how to strengthen and stabilize this tide, and seize the growing momentum to redress manipulated new normal and stereotypes about the incapacity of SE. I am done.
    NB. Please share with Dr. Diala that I am both a player as well a keen observer of Nigeria politics.

    Like

  3. I appreciate and respect Dr Asoluka for at least taking interest and time to read and interrogate my submission in such an intellectual manner.

    His initial response came out a bit dismissive and with the experiences many of us have had in recent times, I became a bit more apprehensive.

    I want to assure Dr Asoluka that I’m nothing but a passionate and proud Igbo son who has given my little for a better ala Igbo. I am wary of following the crowd and that is something that has hurt ala Igbo so much in the last 7 years.

    Ala Igbo has suffered a lot in recent times, a good chunk of which the blame goes to us beyond all pretenses. We can ill afford any more. Hence my apprehension. One who who’s beaten by a snake is easily scared by a piece of long rope.

    Nothing devastates a people or a person like shattered dreams and high hopes.

    Let me be clear. There’s absolutely nothing wrong with the Peter Obi dream and I’m not against it but it has to be packaged, carried and sold in the most responsible and realistic manner; both by him and anyone who is pushing the campaign.

    I might even get on board if it is handled properly.

    God Bless Ala Igbo.

    Dr Uche Diala

    Like

Leave a Reply to Admin. Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s