The creation and ceding of Anioma State back to the South East, far more than the proposed ANIM State, portends a historic milestone for the Igbo race. It would mark the beginning of a long overdue reversal of the balkanization of the Igbo Commonwealth, a process that the British colonial government set in motion in 1934 with the excision of the West Niger, largely Ezechime, Igbo into the then Benin Province. The final and more devastating blow to that fragmentation was struck at the onset of the Civil War, when the marine and hydrocarbon rich Coastal Igbo territories, stretching to Igweocha, the Port Harcourt axis, and Igwenga, the Opobo Bonny Atlantic frontiers, were mischievously excised in order to partially landlock the Igbo hinterland and weaken the then nascent Biafran Republic.
The balkanization of the Igbo was, in effect, a historical punishment for what may be described as three perceived capital sins of Ndi Igbo: the Ekumeku resistance against British imperialism, the Biafran War against the Nigerian State, and the uncommon bravery, enterprise and commercial astuteness that denied the Royal Niger Company and other European merchant cartels full oligopolistic control over the pre colonial Niger Delta palm oil economy. In response, the British and their Fulani Caliphate allies deployed balkanization as a deliberate divide and rule instrument to weaken the Igbo Commonwealth and diminish its capacity as an emerging and potentially indefatigable black power. They achieved this through the administrative separation of the Coastal and West Niger Igbos from the hinterland Igbo, thereby disrupting the organic pre colonial commercial solidarity of the race and planting the identity crisis that still haunts many Igbo communities on the fringes of the old homeland.
It is within this historical context that the creation of Anioma State, rather than the newly proposed ANIM State, should be understood. Anioma as the sixth state of the South East would amount to a veritable fait accompli, a bold and long-awaited step toward the historic and even spiritual redemption of a fractured Igbo organic solidarity. It would also address the urgent need to strengthen the political bargaining power of the South East within Nigeria’s complicated political ecosystem, where the region is too often derided as an unviable dot on the map, lacking sufficient demographic weight and economic depth. The addition of Anioma would significantly reinforce the geographical and demographic standing of the Igbo nation in Nigeria’s internal geopolitics, especially as the proposed state would add roughly 7,000 square miles to the territorial footprint of the South East.
Beyond symbolism and history, Anioma presents a compelling case in terms of economic viability. It is a resource rich territory with substantial oil and gas assets, alongside an integrated marine ecology that offers enormous economic possibilities. Six of the nine local government areas in the proposed Anioma State are rich in oil and gas. Bringing that territory into the South East would almost double the number of major oil bearing local governments in the zone. This is precisely the kind of geo economic advantage the South East urgently needs in the face of Nigeria’s changing political economy. Anioma is also, by every practical measure, a ready made state. It already has a fully developed capital city in Asaba, an international airport, and substantial infrastructure, all of which reduce the burden of creating a new state from the ground up.
Equally significant is the commercial and strategic contiguity that Anioma offers the South East. The Asaba Onitsha corridor already stands as one of the busiest trade routes in West Africa. The incorporation of Anioma into the South East would deepen this industrial, logistics and commercial corridor and create the basis for a more ambitious regional integration framework, one capable of replicating, in Igboland, the kind of economic synergy the Lagos Ogun axis has delivered for the South West.
The political economy realities of contemporary Nigeria are increasingly favouring regional integration among the component states of each geopolitical zone. Across the country, states are beginning to collaborate more deliberately under regional arrangements to pursue major projects in strategic sectors such as security architecture, mass transit, irrigation, waterworks, and power generation. Such cooperation depends on the pooling of resources and the leveraging of each state’s comparative advantage. Every zone therefore requires a sufficient degree of ecological and economic diversity among its component units. This is one of the major benefits South East extension into Anioma would provide.
There is also a larger historical and geopolitical dimension that cannot be ignored. Emerging centripetal pressures from unfolding international and domestic realities are beginning to expose and stress the contradictions embedded in the Nigerian federation. In the language of classical political economy, the laws of motion of society are at work. These forces can be deeply disruptive. They can reshape existing political structures, render old arrangements obsolete, and even birth entirely new systems. It is therefore not inconceivable that, in the years ahead, Nigeria’s existing thirty six state framework could become increasingly decrepit and yield to a more consolidated order shaped around the six geopolitical zones, or even other confederal tendencies. While it may be premature to dwell on worst-case scenarios, it would be intellectually irresponsible to ignore the structural pressures now building within the federation.
In any future arrangement that trends toward greater regional agglomeration, the South East in its present form would be seriously disadvantaged because its current geo economic ecosystem lacks the diversity and scale needed to thrive as a formidable economic bloc. That, many would argue, was precisely the mischief embedded in the creation of the defunct East Central State. Behind the official logic of Gowon’s state creation exercise, and with the encouragement of British pseudo-advisers, lay the strategic intention of confining the Igbo to a subnational unit lacking the full geo economic wherewithal to flourish independently or bargain effectively.
That is why the creation and ceding of Anioma State to the South East should be seen as an epochal and necessary act of redress. It would amount to a reversal of the historic balkanization imposed on the Igbo Commonwealth by colonial and neo colonial actors. It should, therefore, become the overriding agenda of the moment for the Igbo intelligentsia, technocrats, statesmen and genuinely visionary politicians. Unfortunately, such a long range view may be lost on the nominal professional politicians for whom politics is merely a contest for immediate gratification and personal advancement. To such actors, state creation is less about civilizational justice or future political economy, and more about the multiplication of offices such as governorships, senate seats, house seats, assembly positions and civil service structures that can be captured in the short run.
That is why promoters of ANIM, Adada or Etiti may dismiss this broader perspective. It does not align with their immediate political calculations. Their interest may lie in the instant opportunities that new state structures create, not in the deeper question of what arrangement best secures the long term existential interests of the Igbo people. For such politicians, the operative prayer is not a strategic vision for unborn generations, but merely give us this day our daily bread.
My concluding prayer, therefore, is that God grants all critical Igbo political actors, including our governors, legislators and opinion moulders, the grace and wisdom of the biblical children of Issachar, who understood the times and knew what Israel ought to do. More than the pursuit of daily bread, the Igbo political class, especially the promoters of ANIM State, need a far deeper understanding of this moment in history and of what its emerging political economy realities portend for a people too long mocked as a dot on the map. Anioma is not merely another state proposal. It is a historic opportunity for restoration, strategic expansion, and the recovery of a people’s broken geopolitical inheritance.
By Hon. Chima Nnadi-Oforgu
Duruebube Uzii na Abosi
OBLONG MEDIA GLOBAL INTELLIGENCE 
Leave a comment