OBLONG MEDIA ANALYSIS.
I am an autodidact and an intellectual, a Stoic, a minimalist, an Epicurean, and a self actualised man who values wisdom, purpose, contentment, and the quality of life above the endless pursuit of material wealth. So, I’m not in the best position to give this advise in terms of experience.
There is a simple analogy often attributed to Chinese entrepreneur Jack Ma that carries a much larger message about money, employment and entrepreneurship.
Put bananas and money in front of monkeys, the argument goes, and the monkeys will choose the bananas.
Why?
Because they understand the immediate value of the banana, but they do not understand that the money could buy many more bananas.
Now apply the same principle to people.
Put a job and a business opportunity in front of many people, and most will choose the job.
The reasoning is essentially the same.
The job represents something immediately understandable: work a certain number of hours, complete a defined responsibility and receive a predictable salary.
The business represents something different. There may be no guaranteed salary. There is risk, uncertainty and responsibility. But there is also the possibility of creating something whose value extends far beyond the amount somebody is willing to pay you for an hour, a day or a month of your labor.
The central argument is not simply that people make bad financial decisions.
It is that most people have been trained to recognize employment more easily than they recognize opportunity.
WHAT SCHOOL TEACHES US TO SEE
From childhood, the conventional path is familiar.
Go to school.
Study hard.
Pass your examinations.
Acquire qualifications.
Find a good job.
Work hard.
Earn a salary.
There is nothing inherently wrong with that path. The deeper argument, however, is that the education system overwhelmingly prepares people to participate in existing economic structures rather than teaching them how to build structures of their own.
Students learn how to become employees.
Far fewer learn how to identify an underserved market, calculate risk, raise capital, sell a product, build a company, understand ownership or turn an idea into an income producing asset.
So when employment and entrepreneurship eventually appear side by side, one looks normal while the other looks dangerous.
That difference in perception matters.
WAGES CAN SUPPORT YOU. PROFITS CAN BUILD WEALTH.
This is the central distinction behind the message.
A wage pays you for your work. A profit pays you for creating value and retaining ownership in what produces that value.
With employment, income is generally connected to compensation determined by an employer.
With business ownership, income can become connected to the performance and scale of the enterprise itself.
That is why the argument says:
Wages can support you, but profits can make you a fortune.
A salary can pay rent, feed a family, provide security and create a comfortable life.
But ownership introduces another possibility.
If you create something that can serve ten customers, then one hundred, then ten thousand, the income producing capacity of that business is no longer necessarily limited to the number of hours you personally work.
That is the power the analogy is trying to communicate.
The difference is not merely working harder.
It is understanding leverage and ownership.
WHY OPPORTUNITIES ARE OFTEN INVISIBLE
This also explains why two people can encounter exactly the same situation and see completely different things.
One person sees a problem.
Another sees a market.
One sees an empty piece of land.
Another sees development.
One sees people complaining about an expensive service.
Another sees demand for a cheaper competitor.
One sees unemployment.
Another asks what those unemployed people could produce.
One sees a product everybody imports.
Another asks whether it could be produced locally.
Entrepreneurial thinking begins with learning to recognize economic possibilities that other people overlook.
Without that mindset, opportunity can sit directly in front of someone and remain invisible.
Just like the money sitting beside the bananas.
THE SAFETY TRAP
The message also challenges society’s understanding of safety.
People frequently choose employment because it appears to be the safer option.
A salary arrives every month.
Entrepreneurship does not offer that certainty.
But the argument asks us to consider another side of risk.
If your entire livelihood depends upon one employer, one salary and one decision maker, how independent are you really?
A company can restructure.
An industry can decline.
Technology can eliminate certain jobs.
Economic conditions can change.
The supposedly safe path therefore contains risks of its own.
Entrepreneurship involves obvious risks because the individual can see the uncertainty directly.
Employment can involve less visible risks because somebody else appears to carry the responsibility.
The larger lesson is therefore not simply “quit your job and start a business.”
It is to understand the difference between earning income and building ownership.
THE REAL EDUCATION IS FINANCIAL
The argument ultimately becomes a question of financial literacy.
Do people understand assets?
Do they understand ownership?
Do they understand profit?
Can they identify demand?
Can they recognize an opportunity?
Can they distinguish between consuming money and investing it?
Can they calculate risk rather than simply fear it?
Without that knowledge, people naturally gravitate toward whatever economic choice they understand best.
And for millions of people, that choice is the salary.
They have spent years being trained to qualify for employment while receiving comparatively little education about creating businesses, owning productive assets or generating profit.
THE OBLONG VIEW
The deeper message is not that employment is useless.
Society needs employees, professionals, engineers, teachers, doctors, technicians and skilled workers. Businesses themselves cannot function without them.
The message is about economic perspective.
If all you have been taught to recognize is a salary, then whenever life presents you with both a salary and an opportunity, you will probably choose the salary.
Not necessarily because it is the better option.
But because it is the option you understand.
That is the point behind the bananas.
The monkey recognizes food but does not recognize the purchasing power represented by money.
Likewise, a person who has never been trained to understand ownership may recognize the immediate value of a paycheck without recognizing the potentially greater value of an opportunity.
And that is why entrepreneurial education matters.
Because before someone can take advantage of an opportunity, they must first learn how to see it.
By Hon. Chimazuru Nnadi-Oforgu
For Oblong Media Global intelligence
Leave a Reply